In their
long history, South Africa, located at the cape of the Africa continent, at one
point experienced being conquered and colonized by a foreign presence. This was
an experience South Africa not only had to deal with once, but twice, under the
control of the Dutch and then the British. How each of these two European
countries obtained their share of the Cape Colony differed and their motives
for conquering it also faced a contrast.
In the late
16th and early 17th century the Dutch sought after the
Cape peninsula, seeing it as a “source of fresh water, meat, and timber for
masts (1).” In 1652, Verengide Oostidishe Compagnie (VOC), a Dutch East India
Company, established the first permanent settlement on the cape in Table Bay.
The settlement originally served as a supply station for provisioning Dutch
fleets. When the Dutch initially settled on the cape, it was done in peace. No
wars were fought and no natives were enslaved. In fact, the VOC didn’t allow
any of the settlers enslave the native Khoikhoi. However, colonial pastoralists began to
encroach onto the land of the Khoikhoi and San, South African hunter-gatherers,
in an attempt to expand their territory. These colonists continued to do so,
forcing the Khoikhoi, San, and other hunter-gatherer communities into “marginal
areas (2).”
The British occupied South Africa in 1795 and
then again in 1806. They, on the other hand, conquered the Cape by simply
taking it from the Dutch East India Company (how has not been explained by
various sources). Their motives for obtaining the Cape were to keep it out of
the hands of Napoleon and the French, who the British were at war with, because
the Cape served as an important sea route to the East. In Britain’s initial conquest
they planned to keep the settlement small. Britain’s key to the settlement lied
in its strategic location.
No comments:
Post a Comment